News

May 24, 2024

Preparation of Fe3O4/vine shoots derived activated carbon nanocomposite for improved removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous solutions

Scientific Reports volume 13, Article number: 3960 (2023) Cite this article 775 Accesses Metrics details In this study, Fe3O4/activated carbon nanocomposite was successfully synthesized for removal of

Scientific Reports volume 13, Article number: 3960 (2023) Cite this article

775 Accesses

Metrics details

In this study, Fe3O4/activated carbon nanocomposite was successfully synthesized for removal of Chromium from aqueous solutions. The Fe3O4 nanoparticles were decorated on vine shoots-derived activated carbon using co-precipitation method. The atomic absorption spectrometer was used to evaluate the removal of Chromium ions by the prepared adsorbent. The effect of various parameters such as adsorbent dose, pH, contact time, reusability, electric field, and initial Chromium concentration were examined to find the optimum conditions. According to the results, the synthesized nanocomposite showed a high ability to remove Chromium at an optimized pH of 3. At optimum conditions, a high removal efficiency of 90% and an excellent adsorption capacity of 305.30 mg/g was obtained. In addition, adsorption isotherms and adsorption kinetics were studied in this research. The results showed that the data are well fitted with the Freundlich isotherm and the adsorption process is spontaneous and follows the pseudo-second-order model.

Over the past few years, due to the irreparable damage caused by water pollution, many researchers have begun to remove pollution with various nanocomposites to reduce water pollution1. Industrial effluents or sewage, which contain organic or inorganic impurities, such as Chromium, Arsenic, Lead, Nickel, Mercury, Cadmium, etc., are the primary sources of water pollution2. Chromium is a primary heavy metal widely used as an occurrence in water bodies from other industrial processes such as leather tanning, plastic, metallurgy industries, wood preservatives, and electroplating which are all examples of industrial pollution3,4,5,6. As other examples, the release of used Chromium in cooling systems, electroplating industry, tanning industry and paint pigments into the environments increase the toxic effluents, which cause a major issue in food chain7. Chromium is a toxic metal and Cr(VI) and Cr(III) are two stable oxidation states of it. Compared with Cr(III), Cr(VI) is much more toxic due to its carcinogenic and mutagenic properties, more soluble, and is more deadly to humans, animals, and plants8. To remove Cr(VI), numerous ways, such as ion exchange, chemical reduction, ultrafiltration, adsorption, and biological treatment, have been brought up9. According to previous researches, adsorption is cost-effective, efficient, and accessible for removing Chromium (VI) from an aqueous solution10. Absorbents can be classified into four groups: biochar-based composite materials, adsorbents, polymers, and activated carbon11,12,13,14,15. Due to their high stability and outstanding performances, porous carbon materials have been extensively used in energy storage and water remediation. Among the various types of carbonaceous materials, such as carbon nanofibers, carbon nanotubes, and graphene, activated carbons derived from biomass are incredibly useful due to their environmental and hierarchical structures of the raw material abundance, and low cost16. Carbons derived from numerous biomass such as olive pips17, palm shells18, sugar cane19, peanut shells20, walnut shells21, and persimmon fruit22 perform outstandingly in removing pollution from water. The biochar-based composite materials are considered lower cost, better functional, higher efficiency, and more potential adsorption23. Presently, biochar-based materials on Cr(VI) removal studies usually focus on magnetic separation and removal efficiency or reusability. In synthesizing magnetic adsorbents, magnetite nanoparticles are typically used as a magnetic material to separate metal ions and organic pollutants. In this study, Fe3O4/C was prepared in two stages, including synthesizing magnetic nanoparticles and their modification using activated carbon. The present work investigates the ability of the activated carbon derived from the vine shoots to remove Cr(IV) ions, considered one of the most toxic heavy metals produced in industrial technologies, causing significant environmental and economic problems from the water. We focused on enhancing the adsorption capacity and efficiency using Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles grafted with activated carbon (Fe3O4/C) nanocomposite as an adsorbent to remove Chromium from the aqueous solution. Moreover, we discussed the adsorption behaviors using batch experiments and related physical and chemical mechanisms. In addition to investigating the effects of various parameters affecting adsorption, the effect of electric field on adsorption efficiency and recyclability of the Fe3O4/C composite was also assessed. The preparing method and synergistic interactions could be a generalized strategy for the nanoparticle/ porous materials system. The improved adsorption performance may apply to environmental protection and sustainable resources.

The results of the XRD for Fe3O4 nanoparticles and the Fe3O4/C magnetic composite in the range of 2θ = 20–80° are shown in Fig. 1. The diffraction patterns of the samples have peaks at 30.05, 35.07, 37.30, 43.05, 53.80, 57.03, and 62.80°, corresponding to the (220), (311), (222), (400), (422), (511) and (440), lattice planes of the FCC structure of Fe3O4 phase (JCPDS card No.96-900-5843), respectively. There are no significant structural change in XRD pattern of nanocomposite, before and after adsorption process, which reveals structural stability of the prepared sample.

XRD patterns of Fe3O4 and Fe3O4/C before adsorption, Fe3O4/C after adsorption samples.

The FE-SEM was used to evaluate and compare the morphology of the synthesized samples. Figure 2 shows the SEM images of the samples. As can be seen in Fig. 2a, the Fe3O4 sample consists of magnetic nanoparticles. After the preparation of nanocomposite (Fe3O4/C) the morphology (Fig. 2b) has become more uniform in comparison to Fe3O4 sample. In the case of activated carbon nanocomposites, carbon penetrates the cavities between the catalysts and creates a uniform surface. In addition, one of the criteria for the proper performance of nanoparticles is the lack of particle aggregation, which was not observed in these nanostructures, indicating their successful synthesis. As exhibited in the image, the adsorbent has a spherical structure, and after modifying it with activated carbon, the adsorbent has maintained its spherical structure. The SEM image for adsorbent after adsorption process (Fig. 2c) confirms morphological stability of the prepared sample.

SEM images of (a) Fe3O4, and Fe3O4/C, (b) before and (c) after Cr(VI) adsorption.

EDX analysis was used to investigate the chemical elements of the samples. The results of this analysis are shown in Fig. 3. The figure shows that the iron, oxygen, and carbon elements are present in the powders. By calculating stoichiometry from the chemical formula, the experimental and stoichiometric values are almost in good agreement with each other. Elemental mapping analysis shows the presence and dispersion of the iron in the Fe3O4/C nanocomposite (Fig. 4). This analysis confirms that the adsorbent was fully coated with magnetite and had no free activated carbon.

EDX spectrum (a) Fe3O4, (b) Fe3O4/C before adsorption, (c) Fe3O4/C after adsorption Cr(VI) adsorption.

Elemental mapping analysis of Fe3O4/C nanocomposite.

Figure 5 shows the Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra of the samples. In the FT-IR spectra of Fe3O4, the characteristic peaks at 581 cm−1 were assigned to Fe–O in the spinel phase. The peaks observed in 3426 and 1623 cm−1, corresponding to vibrations of (OH) and (C=O) stretching bonds, respectively. In addition, the peaks in 2853 and 2923 cm−1 are related to aldehydes’ stretching vibrations (–C–H). In the Fe3O4/C nanocomposite spectra, there are two peaks at 1551 and 1623 cm−1, indicating the carbonyl group for the amides. Also, the sharpening of the 3423 cm-−1 peak is due to the overlap related to vibrations of OH and (N–H) stretching. The peak of flexural vibrations -NH was observed in 2921 and 2853 cm−1, which belongs to the amide functional group and overlaps with the stretching vibrations –C–H of the aldehyde group. Therefore, there is a slight difference compared to the peaks of the Fe3O4 spectra.

FT-IR spectra of Fe3O4 and Fe3O4/C before adsorption, Fe3O4/C after adsorption samples.

According to the VSM results in Table 1 and Fig. 6, it can be seen that the maximum magnetization of Fe3O4 is higher than Fe3O4/C nanocomposites, which is due to non-magnetic nature of the activated carbon. The coercive field of iron ferrite is almost equal to that of the composite sample. The MR/MMax ratio is also constant as the residual magnetization decreases. However, the magnetic property of Fe3O4/C is strong enough that it can to be quickly separated from the heavy metal ion solution using an external magnetic field. Also the result shows that both samples are superparamagnetic; also composite saturation magnetization of 30.34 emu g−1, gives the adsorbent the privilege of magnetic separation and good retrievability. The observed reduction in magnetization of composite sample after adsorption could be due to adsorbed moisture and presence of nonmagnetic Cr(VI) ions.

Magnetic hysteresis loops of (a) Fe3O4, (b) Fe3O4/C, before adsorption, and (c) Fe3O4/C after adsorption.

Figure 7 shows the TGA and corresponding DTG curves of the activated carbon and Fe3O4/C. For the activated carbon sample, a three-step degradation pattern was observed with the first step upon increasing the temperature to 175 °C, the weight of the sample was reduced by 0.83%, apparently caused by the loss in moisture content followed by a 3.38% reduction in weight between 175 and 475 °C in the second-step which may be attributed to loss of hemicellulose and cellulose residues as well as volatile fractions. In the third step, at 475–999 °C a much higher loss in weight by 29.69% was observed, accounting for the devolatilization of thermally stable volatile compounds, degradation of lignin and oxidation of carbon.

Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) of (a) activated carbon, (b) Fe3O4/C.

As an activation temperature of 700 °C for 1.5 h was used for preparation of AC, most of the hemicellulose and cellulose as well as volatile fractions should undergo decomposition resulting in only a minor loss 3.38% in the second step. Also observed weight-loss pattern for Fe3O4/C nanocomposite, shows weight reduction of 0.80%, and 35.70% for the temperature ranging from 25 to 175 °C and 175 to 999 °C, respectively.

The stock solution (500 mg/L) was prepared by dissolving 1.414 g potassium dichromate in 1 L deionized water, and 50 mg/L concentration was prepared by diluting the stock solution. To find the optimal pH in the absorption of hexavalent chromium by Fe3O4/C nanocomposite, 15 mL chromium solutions with a concentration of 50 mg/L were used at different pHs (2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12). 0.1 M sodium hydroxide solution and 0.1 M hydrochloric acid were used to adjust the initial pH of the solutions in this range, and finally, pH = 3 was chosen as the optimal pH.

The effect of contact time between chromium solution and adsorbent was investigated at different contact times of 1, 5, 15, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min in optimal pH with a concentration of 50 mg/L. Therefore, to check other absorption parameters, 30 min time was considered to reach equilibrium. Because of increasing the contact time from the beginning of the absorption process until 30 min, the amount of absorption increased from 42 to 62%, while from 30 to 120 min.

To determine the optimal amount of adsorbent dose for absorbing Cr(VI) from a solution (15 mL) with a concentration of 50 mg/L, different amounts (2–10 mg) of synthesized Fe3O4/C adsorbent were added to potassium dichromate solutions. Then the chromium solutions containing the corresponding adsorbent were stirred by a mechanical shaker. After the optimal period of 30 min, the samples were absorbed by an external magnet. The optimal value of adsorbent dose for Cr(VI) removal by Fe3O4/C nanocomposite was selected as 6 mg.

In order to study the effect of concentration change on chromium removal, solutions with different initial concentrations (5, 25, 75, 100, 150, 200 mg/L) of chromium were prepared. The removal of hexavalent chromium in this range of different concentrations was investigated by 6 mg Fe3O4/C adsorbent at pH = 3 and at room temperature. These solutions were stirred by a mechanical shaker for an optimal period of 30 min.

pH is one of the critical parameters that affects the adsorption surface load and contaminant structure in the adsorption process. In this study, the removal of Cr(VI) was studied in batch experiments at the pH = 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12. The experiments were performed using adsorbent dose of 0.007 g, the initial concentration of 50 mg /L, the contact time of 30 min and ambient temperature of 25 ± 2 °C (Fig. 8a,b). Due to the additional OH− ions and a negative charge at alkaline pHs, the adsorbent surface had a negative charge; thus, a repulsive force was created between the adsorbent and negatively charged Chromium molecules. Subsequently, the adsorption efficiency will be reduced. But at acidic pHs, the Fe3O4/C adsorbent surface will have a positive charge because increasing the production of available protons can add to the adsorbent surface, creating an electrostatic attraction between the adsorbent and the adsorbate and ultimately increasing the adsorption efficiency. The efficiency of Cr(VI) adsorption decreases by increasing pH. The decreasing trend might be attributable to the changes in Chromium speciation and surface charges of the adsorbent as a function of pH. Cr(VI) shows different oxidation states In aqueous solutions, and it commonly occurs in one of three ionic forms, i.e., dichromate \(\left({\mathrm{Cr}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{7}^{-}\right)\), bichromate \(\left({\mathrm{HcrO}}_{4}^{-}\right)\), and chromate \(\left({\mathrm{CrO}}_{4}^{2-}\right.\)). In addition, the concentration of OH− increases, which compete with \(\left({\mathrm{Cr}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{7}^{-}\right)\), and \(\left({\mathrm{CrO}}_{4}^{2-}\right.\)) ions to be adsorbed on the surface of Fe3O4/C NPs. Thus, the removal efficiency decreases24.

The effect of different parameters on Cr(VI) removal.

Contact time is one of the most critical factors affecting the absorption process. Because the adsorption process is equilibrium, the contact time factor represents the equilibrium time between the adsorbent and the adsorbate and plays an essential role in the reaction. Therefore, to investigate the effect of contact time on the adsorption process, the relevant experiments were performed at pH = 3, and different contact times of 1, 5, 15, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min. The adsorbent dose was 0.007 g and a concentration of was 50 mg/L. The Chromium removal rate in the first 60 min of absorption was much faster than in the next 60 min and gradually slowed down. One of the reasons that can increase the adsorption rate at the beginning of the process is the presence of active sites on the adsorbent surface. The number of these active sites is higher at first also the solute concentration gradient is high. Still, over time and by occupying them, a repulsive force is created between the molecules dissolved in the bulk and solid phase, which leads to a decrease in adsorption efficiency. This shows the possible monolayer formation of Cr(VI) ions on the outer surface25. It is evident from the Fig. 8c,d that more than 90% of removal of Cr takes place within 30 min.

Increasing the adsorbent dose provides more exchange surface to the adsorbent, increasing the equilibrium absorption. Thus, solutions with a concentration of 50 mg/L and pH = 3 (optimal) and a contact time of 30 min (optimal) with different amounts of absorbent dose (0.002, 0.004, 0.006, 0.008, 0.01 g) were used. As shown in Fig. 8e,f, the amount of Chromium adsorption increases with increasing adsorbent dose because the number of active adsorption sites on the adsorbent surface and empty sites increases with an increase the amount of adsorbent. The increased amount of adsorbent positively and negatively affected adsorption efficiency and capacity, respectively. The saturation of active sites on the adsorbent surface during the adsorption process was probably due to the decreased Chromium adsorption rate with increasing Fe3O4/C adsorbent concentration. Increasing the free sites on the adsorbent surface is the main reason for increasing the adsorption efficiency by increasing the adsorbent dosage. Thus, with increasing concentration, the ratio of Chromium concentration to the available surface of the adsorbent decreases. As a result, the adsorption efficiency of Chromium decreases. Due to the reduction of the surface available for absorption and the agglomeration of the absorption area at higher doses, the rate of adsorption reaches saturation at higher doses. Therefore, a large amount of nanocomposite Fe3O4/C can purify a larger amount of water solution with a certain amount of adsorbent26.

To stabilize the adsorption process, the adsorbents must be reusable. Studies have been performed to evaluate the reuse potential of nanocomposites. In this research, the adsorbent dose was 0.006 g, pH was 3, initial concentration was 200 mg/L, and contact time was 30 min at room temperature. According to the results obtained and shown in Fig. 8g,h, the adsorption efficiency of the first load compared to the second load has decreased by only 10%. Next, only a 1% decrease in adsorption efficiency is observed, indicating the adsorbent’s stability.

The effect of electric field is one of the parameters that was investigated in this research. We used the idea of electrokinetic soil remediation using electric field27. Applying an electric field can increse the ions movements inside the solution. The applied electric force causes accumulation, precipitation and chemisorption of ions on graphitic cathodes, hence increse the removal efficiency28. In this section, 10 rectangular graphite electrodes were used, located at the same distance, and connected to the voltage supply as cathode and anode (Fig. 9d). The initial concentration of Chromium was 200 mg/L, and pH = 3. Voltages equal to (5, 10, 15, 20 V) were applied with currents (0.23, 0.90, 1.45, 2 mA) for 10 min. After applying the voltage, 0.006 g of adsorbent was added to the solution, and a shaker stirred it for 30 min. Figure 9a,b show the effect of electric field on Chromium adsorption efficiency without using adsorbent and after adding the adsorbent, respectively. In addition, the Fig. 9c shows adsorption capacity in the presence of electric field. It is clear from the figure that the q can reach to a high value above 300 mg/g by applying a small electric field.

Effect of electric field on Chromium adsorption efficiency. (a) Without adsorbent, (b) after adding the adsorbent, (c) adsorption capacity, (d) schematic illustration of the set-up.

The effect of initial Cr(VI) concentration on adsorption, adsorbent dose 0.006 g, and initial Chromium concentrations (5, 25, 75, 100, 150, 200 mg /L) and other parameters were constant. The amount of residual Chromium was determined in solution after 30 min. It can be inferred that with increasing the initial concentration of Chromium, the number of active adsorption sites at the adsorbent surface fills faster; as a result, the adsorption efficiency decreases.

Figure 10 shows the effect of initial Cr(VI) concentration on removal efficiency and adsorption capacity. Different models and equations of adsorption equilibrium isotherms are used to describe the adsorbent surface properties, the maximum adsorption amount, and conditions for optimal adsorption29. For this purpose, the Langmuir and Freundlich isotherms have been used in this study. Figures 10c,d show Langmuir and Freundlich isotherms plot for adsorption of Cr(VI) using Fe3O4/C. The Langmuir isotherm model is based on the uniform adsorption of adsorbent material with the same energy on all adsorbent surfaces. The Freundlich isotherm is based on the multilayer and heterogeneous adsorption of the adsorbent on the adsorbent. The effect of the initial concentration of the Cr(VI) was investigated in the range of 5–200 mg/L with the pH of 3. The fit results by two models reveals that the experimental data were in accordance with Freundlich isotherm, Table 2. Freundlich model shows that multilayer adsorption was carried on the adsorbent surface. be used the value of the n parameter in the Freundlich isotherm (which is greater than one) indicates the suitability of Cr(VI) adsorption to the Fe3O4/AC30.

Effect of initial Cr(VI) concentration. (a) removal efficiency, (b) adsorption capacity, (c) Freundlich isotherm plot, (d) Langmuir isotherm plot for adsorption of Cr(VI) using Fe3O4/C.

The N2 adsorption–desorption isotherm of Fe3O4/C is given in Fig. 11, related to the adsorption isotherm of type IV. This type of isotherm is for mesoporous materials31, and is often observed for catalysts, and the corresponding curve is used to determine the pore size distribution. Hysteresis indicates the presence of mesoporous pores in the material. The smaller pores are related to the carbon deposition on the surface of nanoparticles; larger mesopores may form between secondary aggregated particles. The mesopores and their high surface area endow the as-prepared Fe3O4/C with novel adsorption application potentials.

The N2 adsorption–desorption isotherm.

In this part, the adsorbent dose was 0.006 g, the initial concentration was 200 mg/L, pH = 3, contact time of 30 min, and temperatures of bath were 298, 308, 318 and 328 K. According to the obtained results in Fig. 12, it is observed that with increasing temperature, the percentage of adsorption efficiency and adsorption capacity increase. In the study of adsorption processes, another important factor is the use of thermodynamic parameters of adsorption. It is necessary to determine the changes of three standard enthalpy factors (\(\Delta {\mathrm{H}}^{\circ }\)), free energy (\(\Delta {\mathrm{G}}^{\circ }\)), and standard entropy (\(\Delta {\mathrm{S}}^{\circ }\)). Regardless of the adsorption process being endothermic or exothermic, as well as to determine the spontaneity of the reaction. Using the following equations, these parameters are calculated. Figure 12, and Table 3 show the relevant parameters32:

Effects of temperature on Cr(VI) removal by the Fe3O4/C (a) removal efficiency, (b) adsorption capacity, (c) Ln Ke plot 1/T for Chromium adsorption.

According to the results of Table 3, it can be seen that the values (\(\Delta {\mathrm{G}}^{\circ }\)) in the two equations of \(\Delta {\mathrm{G}}^{\circ }=-\mathrm{RT Ln}{\mathrm{K}}_{\mathrm{e}}\) and \(\Delta {\mathrm{G}}^{\circ }=\Delta {\mathrm{H}}^{\circ }-\mathrm{T\Delta }{\mathrm{S}}^{\circ }\) are slightly different.

Kinetic equations are used to investigate the factors affecting the reaction rate. We used pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order kinetic models that are more common for the Chromium adsorption process33,34. The kinetics of sorption can be expressed by a first-order model, which leads to the following equation:

where qe and qt (both in mg/g) are the removal amounts of Cr(VI) at equilibrium time and at time t (min), respectively. The k1 (min−1) is the corresponding adsorption rate constant. The values of qe and k1 are determined from the intercept and the slope of the plots of ln (qe − qt) versus t, respectively.

The pseudo-second-order can be represented as follows:

where K2 is the pseudo-second-order rate constant. The kinetics of the Cr(VI)/Fe3O4/C system were analyzed at initial pH values of 3. Figure 13 shows the non-linear experimental data to the kinetic models. The magnitude of R2 in Table 4 indicated that the adsorption of Cr(VI) onto the sorbent was best fitted with a pseudo-second-order kinetic model.

(a) First-order, (b) second-order plot for adsorption of Cr(VI) by Fe3O4/C nanocomposite.

According to the values obtained from the kinetic parameters of Chromium adsorption by Fe3O4/C nanocomposite, the calculated adsorption capacity values (qe.Cal) in the pseudo-second-order kinetic model are 79.74 mg/g, which is closer to the adsorption capacity of the experiments (qe.exp = 79.43 mg/g). The adsorption capacity in the pseudo-first-order model is 16.99 mg/g. By comparing the correlation coefficient (R2) of the two kinetic models, it is concluded that the adsorbent follows the pseudo-second-order kinetic. The difference in the reports can be caused by the difference in the conditions of the adsorption tests and the type of adsorbents35.

Knowing the specific surface of the absorbent is considered one of the essential factors for the adsorbent. The higher the specific surface area, the greater the porosity of the material and the greater the contact surface with the adsorbing material. The results are presented in Table 5 and Fig. 14. The specific surface obtained from this analysis is 759 (m2/g). And the total volume of porosity Vm is 174 (cm3(STP)/g). The mean pore diameter is 2.5 nm. To measure micropores in the presence of mesoporous, t plot analysis is used, which is usually used to measure the volume and surface area of micropores. The specific surface area of all mesoporous and micropores is a1 = 871.3 (m2/g), the volume of absorbed gas in standard conditions is V1 = 0 (cm3/g), and its linear slope is 565/41. Pore size distribution is calculated through the BJH diagram, which has a ascending trend from 1.2 to 8 nm. The diameter of the pore, the regional distribution of the pores, and the volume of the pores are obtained from this method. This method is effective for the scale area of macropore and small mesoporous. The distribution of the size of the pores is based on their radius, the highest frequency of which is 1.21 nm. The total pore volume is Vp = 0.218 (cm3/g) and the obtained specific surface is ap = 166.56 (m2/g). Comparable BET analysis some related materials reported by others – for instance, the magnetic carbon materials synthesized by (i) Fe3O4/C from termite feces as a precursor with SBET values of 699(m2/g). The pore size distribution radius is about 1.8–2.5 nm. The shape of the holes is cylindrical they can be classified as type IV, characteristic of mesoporous material30. (ii) Surface area, pore volume, particle size, and average pore diameter of Fe3O4/C (Sunflower Head Waste) are 51.1 (m2/g), 0.0386 (cm3 g−1), 9 to 18 nm and 3.293 Å, respectively. The nanoparticles shape and structure are tubular and porous36. (iii) (Fe-MCNs) magnetic mesoporous carbon nanospheres with pore size, SBET and pore volume obtained are 2.7 nm, 619 (m2/g) and 0.52 cm3 g−1, respectively and the shape of Fe-MCNs are spherical with diameters of ~ 110 nm37.

(a) Langmuir plot, (b) BET plot, (c) t plot, (d) BJH plot.

The maximum adsorption capacity of Fe3O4/C sorbent for Cr(VI) removal was compared with that of various other adsorbents. The results are presented in Tables 6 and 7. As shown in the Table 6, the adsorption capacity of Fe3O4/C sorbent for Chromium removal is much higher (305.30 mg/g) than previously reported using other adsorbents. These results confirm the high potential of the prepared nanocomposite for wastewater treatment applications and heavy metals removal.

In this study, with Fe3O4/C nanocomposite were synthesized by co-precipitation method using activated carbon derived from vine shoots. The composite was used for Cr removal from simulated wastewater. The different parameters were studied and the results revealed that the removal of hexavalent Chromium is more favorable in an acidic environment with optimal pH of 3. The maximum adsorption capacity of 305.3 mg/g was obtained at the optimal pH and by applying an electric field, it was found that the nanoparticles well follow the Freundlich isotherm properly, and also the adsorption process follows the pseudo-second-order model. The temperature dependent adsorption process showed that, with the increase of bath temperature, the adsorption efficiency increases. The obtained thermodynamic parameters indicate the spontaneity of the adsorption. The high adsorption efficiency and capacity beside ease of separating the nanocomposite from the liquid phase are advantages of the prepared nanocomposite. With major focus on eco-friendly remediation, viable, and cost-efficient methods for THMs (toxic heavy metals), research is still largely in its developmental stage and continuous efforts are in progress worldwide for collecting sufficient information to enable consideration and overcome inherent shortcomings. However, no individual remediation method has been identified that is universally effective and applicable for complete detoxification of the contamination of heavy metals. It can be used as a suitable absorbent for water and wastewater. Among the advantages of this adsorbent, we can mention its catalytic properties, quick and easy separation, as well as not using expensive and long-term filtration and centrifugation methods to separate it from aqueous.

All chemicals and reagents were of analytical grade; potassium dichromate salt (K2Cr2O7, 99%), (NaOH, 99%), (HCl, 37%), Ferric chloride (FeCl3⋅6H2O, 99%) and Ferrous chloride (FeCl2 0.4H2O, 99%), Zinc chloride (ZnCl2, 99%) were purchased from Merck company.

Figure 15 is a schematic trend of composite preparation. In the preparation of activated carbon, vine shoots were applied as biomass. The vine shoots were collected after the grape harvest from the vineyard in Urmia city. We confirm that the use of vine shoots in the present study complies with international and national guidelines.

Schematic illustration of the fabrication of vine shoots porous carbon and synthesis of Fe3O4/C nanocomposite.

To produce activated carbon from the vine shoots, first they were cleaned manually, followed by washing with deionized water (DI) to remove the dust. After washing, the vine shoots were dried for 3 days, and then the dried biomass was chopped into small pieces (0.5 cm). After that, vine shoots were soaked in ZnCl2 solution for 24 h. The saturated samples were dried in an oven at 110 °C for 12 h. The samples were carbonized at 700 °C under nitrogen atmosphere. After 1.5 h of heating, the obtained carbonized material was allowed to cool down gradually for 24 h. The sample was soaked in HCl; the mixtures were left overnight at room temperature and then filtered and washed with deionized water until the pH of filtrate reached 7. As-prepared samples were washed with deionized water twice and then dried at 110 °C for 5 h to become black products. Finally, the activated product was ground by using a high-speed grinder. Then the powders were passed through a 125 μm mesh. Finally, the obtained uniform powders were washed with water and dried at 120 °C to get the activated carbon.

We used the co-precipitation method to synthesize Fe3O4 and Fe3O4/C nanocomposite. For Fe3O4/C nanocomposite, first, we prepared an aqueous mixture of 200 ml containing 0.2 mol/L, FeCl3⋅6H2O and 0.1 mol/L, FeCl2 0.4H2O with a molar ratio of Fe3+:Fe2+ = 2:1. The solution was stirred for 10 min at 80 °C. Subsequently, required molar proportion (1:1) of activated carbon was added to the above solution under constant stirring for 30 min at 80 °C. After that, 50 mL of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solution with a concentration of 3.4 M was added drop-wise to the mixture and stirred for 30 min and then were carefully added to the above solution (Fig. 15). Afterward, the black powder was filtered and washed with deionized water. Finally, the final product was dried at room temperature for 24 h.

Crystal structures and phases in each sample were corroborated by X-ray diffraction (XRD-China; Asenware with AW-XDM300). The morphology of the nanoparticles was studied by scanning electron microscopy FESEM model TESCAN–MIRA 3 equipped with an energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX). The Fourier transform infrared spectra were performed using a FTIR-Jasco, model 680 Plus, at ambient temperature and in the range of 400–4000 cm−1. The magnetization hysteresis loops were analyzed by a vibration sample magnetometer (VSM- Meghnatis daghigh kavir Co. Iran) at 300 K. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) is the measuring the mass variation of a sample as a function of temperature. The changes in the mass of activated carbon and Fe3O4/C nanocomposite as a function of temperature in a defined and controlled environment from 25 to 1000 °C were measured by TGA/DTG curves in N2 atmosphere at a heating rate of 10 °C min−1. The measurements were carried out using a NETZSCH STA 409 PC/PG, Germany. The pore characteristic of the samples was studied by Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method via nitrogen adsorption–desorption measurements. An atomic absorption spectrophotometer (AAS- Analytik Jena factory, model novaAA 400) was used to determine the concentration of chromium in the solution.

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Tamez, C., Hernandez, R. & Parsons, J. Removal of Cu (II) and Pb (II) from aqueous solution using engineered iron oxide nanoparticles. Microchem. J. 125, 97–104 (2016).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Fahim, N., Barsoum, B., Eid, A. & Khalil, M. Removal of chromium (III) from tannery wastewater using activated carbon from sugar industrial waste. J. Hazard. Mater. 136, 303–309 (2006).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Kumar, A. & Jena, H. M. Adsorption of Cr(VI) from aqueous phase by high surface area activated carbon prepared by chemical activation with ZnCl2. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 109, 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2017.03.032 (2017).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Prajapati, A. K., Das, S. & Mondal, M. K. Exhaustive studies on toxic Cr(VI) removal mechanism from aqueous solution using activated carbon of Aloe vera waste leaves. J. Mol. Liq. 307, 112956 (2020).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Ma, J. & Liu, C. Turning waste into treasure: Reuse of contaminant-laden adsorbents (Cr(VI)-Fe3O4/C) as anodes with high potassium-storage capacity. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 582, 1107–1115 (2021).

Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Ramirez, A. et al. Removal of Cr(VI) from an aqueous solution using an activated carbon obtained from teakwood sawdust: Kinetics, equilibrium, and density functional theory calculations. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 8, 103702 (2020).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Mitra, S., Sarkar, A. & Sen, S. Removal of chromium from industrial effluents using nanotechnology: A review. Nanotechnol. Environ. Eng. 2, 1–14 (2017).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Yu, Y. et al. Unraveling sorption of Cr(VI) from aqueous solution by FeCl3 and ZnCl2-modified corn stalks biochar: Implicit mechanism and application. Bioresour. Technol. 297, 122466 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Srivastava, V. et al. Cytotoxic aquatic pollutants and their removal by nanocomposite-based sorbents. Chemosphere 258, 127324 (2020).

Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Crini, G. & Lichtfouse, E. Advantages and disadvantages of techniques used for wastewater treatment. Environ. Chem. Lett. 17, 145–155 (2019).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Zare, E. N., Motahari, A. & Sillanpää, M. Nanoadsorbents based on conducting polymer nanocomposites with main focus on polyaniline and its derivatives for removal of heavy metal ions/dyes: A review. Environ. Res. 162, 173–195 (2018).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Sims, R. A., Harmer, S. L. & Quinton, J. S. The role of physisorption and chemisorption in the oscillatory adsorption of organosilanes on aluminium oxide. Polymers 11, 410 (2019).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Choudhary, B. & Paul, D. Isotherms, kinetics and thermodynamics of hexavalent chromium removal using biochar. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 6, 2335–2343 (2018).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Liu, Z., Zhang, F.-S. & Sasai, R. Arsenate removal from water using Fe3O4-loaded activated carbon prepared from waste biomass. Chem. Eng. J. 160, 57–62 (2010).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Alemu, A., Lemma, B., Gabbiye, N., Alula, M. T. & Desta, M. T. Removal of chromium (VI) from aqueous solution using vesicular basalt: A potential low cost wastewater treatment system. Heliyon 4, e00682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00682 (2018).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Yao, L., Yang, J., Zhang, P. & Deng, L. In situ surface decoration of Fe3C/Fe3O4/C nanosheets: Towards bi-functional activated carbons with supercapacitance and efficient dye adsorption. Bioresour. Technol. 256, 208–215 (2018).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Nassar, H. et al. Aqueous nitrate ion adsorption/desorption by olive solid waste-based carbon activated using ZnCl2. Sustain. Chem. Pharm. 18, 100335 (2020).

Article Google Scholar

Lestari, I., Kurniawan, E. & Gusti, D. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 012046 (IOP Publishing).

Cai, Y., Liu, L., Tian, H., Yang, Z. & Luo, X. Adsorption and desorption performance and mechanism of tetracycline hydrochloride by activated carbon-based adsorbents derived from sugar cane bagasse activated with ZnCl2. Molecules 24, 4534 (2019).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Guo, F. et al. Synthesis of MgO/Fe3O4 nanoparticles embedded activated carbon from biomass for high-efficient adsorption of malachite green. Mater. Chem. Phys. 240, 122240 (2020).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Zhou, P. et al. Walnut shell-derived nanoporous carbon@Fe3O4 composites for outstanding microwave absorption performance. J. Alloy. Compd. 805, 1071–1080 (2019).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Li, Y. et al. Yolk-shell Fe3O4 nanoparticles loaded on persimmon-derived porous carbon for supercapacitor assembly and As (V) removal. J. Alloy. Compd. 810, 151887 (2019).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Zhang, S., Tao, L., Jiang, M., Gou, G. & Zhou, Z. Single-step synthesis of magnetic activated carbon from peanut shell. Mater. Lett. 157, 281–284 (2015).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Afshin, S. et al. Application of Box-Behnken design for optimizing parameters of hexavalent chromium removal from aqueous solutions using Fe3O4 loaded on activated carbon prepared from alga: Kinetics and equilibrium study. J. Water Process Eng. 42, 102113 (2021).

Article Google Scholar

Giri, A. K., Patel, R. & Mandal, S. Removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous solution by Eichhornia crassipes root biomass-derived activated carbon. Chem. Eng. J. 185, 71–81 (2012).

Article Google Scholar

Prabu, D. et al. Feasibility of magnetic nano adsorbent impregnated with activated carbon from animal bone waste: Application for the chromium (VI) removal. Environ. Res. 203, 111813 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Li, Z., Yu, J. W. & Neretnieks, I. Removal of Cu(II) and Cr(III) from naturally contaminated loam by electromigration. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part A 32, 1293–1308 (1997).

Google Scholar

Farmer, J. C. et al. Electrosorption of chromium ions on carbon aerogel electrodes as a means of remediating ground water. Energy Fuels 11, 337–347 (1997).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Ren, L., Lin, H., Meng, F. & Zhang, F. One-step solvothermal synthesis of Fe3O4@Carbon composites and their application in removing of Cr(VI) and Congo red. Ceram. Int. 45, 9646–9652 (2019).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Demarchi, C. A. et al. Preparation, characterization, and application of magnetic activated carbon from termite feces for the adsorption of Cr(VI) from aqueous solutions. Powder Technol. 354, 432–441 (2019).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Xu, Z. et al. Synthesis of char-based adsorbents from cotton textile waste assisted by iron salts at low pyrolysis temperature for Cr(VI) removal. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 27, 11012–11025 (2020).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Asimakopoulos, G. et al. Advanced Cr(VI) sorption properties of activated carbon produced via pyrolysis of the “Posidonia oceanica” seagrass. J. Hazard. Mater. 405, 124274 (2021).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Norouzi, S. et al. Preparation, characterization and Cr(VI) adsorption evaluation of NaOH-activated carbon produced from Date Press Cake; an agro-industrial waste. Bioresour. Technol. 258, 48–56 (2018).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Su, Q. et al. Improved removal of Cr(VI) using Fe3O4/C magnetic nanocomposites derived from potassium fulvic acid. ChemistrySelect 4, 13656–13662 (2019).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Islam, M. A., Angove, M. J. & Morton, D. W. Recent innovative research on chromium (VI) adsorption mechanism. Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manag. 12, 100267 (2019).

Google Scholar

Yang, J., Yu, M. & Chen, W. Adsorption of hexavalent chromium from aqueous solution by activated carbon prepared from longan seed: Kinetics, equilibrium and thermodynamics. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 21, 414–422 (2015).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Li, S. et al. Fe3O4 modified mesoporous carbon nanospheres: Magnetically separable adsorbent for hexavalent chromium. J. Alloy. Compd. 698, 20–26 (2017).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Pholosi, A., Naidoo, E. B. & Ofomaja, A. E. Batch and continuous flow studies of Cr(VI) adsorption from synthetic and real wastewater by magnetic pine cone composite. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 153, 806–818 (2020).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Labied, R., Benturki, O., EddineHamitouche, A. Y. & Donnot, A. Adsorption of hexavalent chromium by activated carbon obtained from a waste lignocellulosic material (Ziziphus jujuba cores): Kinetic, equilibrium, and thermodynamic study. Adsorpt. Sci. Technol. 36, 1066–1099 (2018).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Chen, C., Zhao, P., Li, Z. & Tong, Z. Adsorption behavior of chromium (VI) on activated carbon from eucalyptus sawdust prepared by microwave-assisted activation with ZnCl2. Desalin. Water Treat. 57, 12572–12584 (2016).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Gottipati, R. & Mishra, S. Preparation of microporous activated carbon from Aegle Marmelos fruit shell and its application in removal of chromium (VI) from aqueous phase. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 36, 355–363 (2016).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Miao, M.-S., Wang, Y.-N., Kong, Q. & Shu, L. Adsorption kinetics and optimum conditions for Cr(VI) removal by activated carbon prepared from luffa sponge. Desalin. Water Treat. 57, 7763–7772 (2016).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Niazi, L., Lashanizadegan, A. & Sharififard, H. Chestnut oak shells activated carbon: Preparation, characterization and application for Cr(VI) removal from dilute aqueous solutions. J. Clean. Prod. 185, 554–561 (2018).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Rambabu, K. et al. Activated carbon from date seeds for chromium removal in aqueous solution. Desalin Water Treat 156, 267–277 (2019).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Jain, M. et al. Development of iron oxide/activated carbon nanoparticle composite for the removal of Cr(VI), Cu(II) and Cd(II) ions from aqueous solution. Water Resour. Ind. 20, 54–74 (2018).

Article Google Scholar

Gupta, V. K., Rastogi, A. & Nayak, A. Adsorption studies on the removal of hexavalent chromium from aqueous solution using a low cost fertilizer industry waste material. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 342, 135–141 (2010).

Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Dang, L. H. et al. Synthesis and study of superparamagnetic Fe3O4/C core-shells nanoparticles for Cd2+ adsorption. Vietnam J. Chem. 60, 700–707 (2022).

CAS Google Scholar

Download references

The authors are grateful for support of University of Tabriz.

Faculty of Physics, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

Maryam Bagherzadeh & Bagher Aslibeiki

Research Laboratory of Polymer, Department of Organic and Biochemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

Nasser Arsalani

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

M.B.: writing original draft, formal analysis, investigation. B.A.: project administration, supervision, writing—review and editing. N.A.: validation, review and editing. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Correspondence to Bagher Aslibeiki.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

Bagherzadeh, M., Aslibeiki, B. & Arsalani, N. Preparation of Fe3O4/vine shoots derived activated carbon nanocomposite for improved removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous solutions. Sci Rep 13, 3960 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31015-x

Download citation

Received: 11 December 2022

Accepted: 06 March 2023

Published: 09 March 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31015-x

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.